Online agreements will become legally binding in the same way, but they will be different with each type of agreement. Thus, these requirements affect various agreements. However, the consideration must take place in the context of the conclusion of the contract, and not as in the previous counterparty. For example, in Eastwood v. Kenyon , the tutor of a young girl, took a loan to educate her. After her marriage, her husband promised to pay the debt, but the loan was classified as a late counterpart. The inadequacy of the previous consideration is linked to the already existing customs rule. In Stilk v.
Myrick , a captain promised to share the salaries of two deserters among the other members of the crew if they agreed to return home on short notice; However, this promise was deemed unenforceable as the crew was already tasked with navigating the ship. The already existing mandatory rule also extends to general legal obligations; for example, a promise not to commit an offence or offence is not sufficient.  Another important element of a binding agreement is that both parties intend that the agreement will have legal consequences. Each party to the contract must declare that it acknowledges that it is legally bound to comply with the contract and that the agreement can be legally enforced. .