Financial institutions rely heavily on agreements with third parties. These companies can outsource financial services to third parties, but they cannot outsource their service responsibilities. It is important to revise the assignment provisions of a supplier contract if a financial institution wishes to have the opportunity to verify and accept a third-party assignment. Limits may be inappropriate, and if the supplier is the guilty party, there should be no limits. Contracts are usually agreements between two designated parties. Third party contract is a good quality term that relates to a party added to a contract between the other two parties. Unlike the two main parts, the document may not mention a third party. This type of agreement can occur in many forms and the characteristics of the agreement depend on the contractual situation. A contract is drawn up and the contracting parties want a third party to be able to take legal action if the promise of the contract is not respected. This person is considered a third party beneficiary.

In other words, if a contract results in benefits for the third party, they become a third party beneficiary with the power to enforce the contract. Agreements concluded with third parties then circumvent the generality of the concept of contract. When it comes to the assignment of the person responsible for the performance of the contract, a third-party contract often refers to the party who assumes the obligations or obligations of a signatory if the signatory is unable to meet the conditions. This type of contract not only allows for the delegation of obligations to perform the contract, but also confers on the third party all the rights granted to the original signatory of the contract. In most cases, a clause is also inserted to indicate the circumstances that would lead to the transfer of responsibilities and rights from the original signatory to the third party. The negotiation, design and agreement of most contracts with third parties (whether real estate or financial) are usually determined by factors more urgent at this stage than the prevention of conflicts between their final terms and those of a construction contract. As simple construction lawyers, we will be involved much later in the process or where the contractor may not have been involved. In fact, the lease, modification license or financing agreement are therefore often presented to the contractor as a fait accompli – it is « what it is ». There is no room for manoeuvre and the owner/funder does not accept anything else.